rev. isaias doleo
a christian theist in a postmodern world
  • home
  • blog
    • financial stewardship
    • gender and sexuality
    • leadership
    • neocalvinism
    • pastoral care
    • the church
    • theology
    • work and vocation
  • papers
    • articles
    • editorials
    • periodicals
    • reviews
  • publications
  • more…
    • curriculum vitae
    • privacy policy
    • research stuff
    • resourceful links

Pride and Despair as spiritual vices

January 19, 2018|blog, theology|blaise pascal, pride and despair, spiritual vices
Despair

Pascal claims that pride and despair can be replaced by the virtues of humility and hope. I will explore here what Pascal means by pride and despair as spiritual vices, and how an encounter with Christ in faith engenders the spiritual virtues of humility and hope.

When Pascal writes that the knowledge of God creates prides one should understand that such knowledge has been acquired without the proper contextualization: the knowledge of humanity’s own wretchedness or misery. Similarly, the knowledge of humanity’s wretchedness leads human beings into despair if they do not have the knowledge of God. In this respect, Pascal writes: “Without this divine knowledge how could men help to felt either exalted at the persistent inward sense of their past greatness or dejected at the sight of their present weakness?” [L208] Pascal here rises the problem of human pride and exaltation and the problem of despair and the lack of hope because of human wretchedness. With this rhetorical question, Pascal suggests that there is not a solution to the problem planted, at least without the involvement of divine knowledge. The main problem arises because humanity is blind and cannot “see the whole truth” — its real condition and its need for a redeemer. This makes that human beings “could not attain perfect virtue.” [L208] For example, Pascal argues that pride is the sin responsible that people believe they can know God.

Unlike Socrates who understood sin exclusively as a problem of human ignorance, Pascal’s pride and despair has to do with a spiritual condition so that it is needed an intersection between divine knowledge and human awareness. For this reason, Pascal focuses on the need for both the divine knowledge that reveals the truth of sin to humanity and the human awareness that helps humans to recognize their needs. As he had written before “One must know oneself. Even if that does not help in finding truth, at least it helps in running one’s life, and nothing is more proper.” [L72]

Thus, for Pascal, both pride and despair are connected to each other since they are related to an epistemological issue: the lack of knowledge of some kind. In Pascal’s view, the accumulation of knowledge of God itself would not bring any benefit for the human condition if the person is not aware of his/her own misery. It only leads people and philosophers to increase their pride. The thing applies to despair: the accumulation of knowledge about the human condition would not benefit us at all. Knowing solely the human misery leads to despair when one discovers that there is not a simple cure for such a condition. With this Pascal establishes the case for the need of his Wager proposal because human pride and despair are serious spiritual sins.

Having in mind this situation Pascal proposes his solution to the human pride and despair. Such a solution is found only in the Christian Gospel because “it is the only religion entitled to teach and correct humankind.” [L208]. The Gospel gives us a mediator who can show the human being both the knowledge of God and the knowledge of human’s wretchedness. In this respect, Pascal writes, “The Incarnation shows man the greatness of his wretchedness through the greatness of the redeem required.” [L352]. This is so because, for Pascal, the Incarnation would be the best doctrine “suited to man than that which teaches him his dual capacity for receiving and losing grace, on account of the dual danger for which he is always exposed of despair or pride.” [L354] As seen Pascal finds in the doctrine of Incarnation a solution to replace despair and pride in the human condition. While the accumulation of the knowledge of God creates pride in the sinful human nature and the accumulation of the knowledge about the human condition creates despair, the knowledge of Christ addresses both in the Incarnation promoting humility and hope.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

June 18, 2022 Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

About the author

Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

I'm an ordained minister currently earning a Ph.D in Philosophical Theology at Calvin Seminary. My purpose with the following blog is to promote critical reflection on modern issues in theology, hoping it sparks stimulating conversations. When not writing, I like to bike and try new coffees.

Related Posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?June 15, 2022
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary MoralityFebruary 7, 2022
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presenceJanuary 17, 2022

Popular Posts

  • Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and female
    Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and femaleNovember 3, 2020
  • Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiation
    Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiationDecember 4, 2020
  • How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?
    How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?February 9, 2021
← Pascal and Kierkegaard on the promotion of christian faith
The early church – Growing in the knowledge and piety of the Lord →

Enter your comments here... Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013

topics

abraham kuyper active life aquinas aristotle atonement augustine bavinck book review calvin calvin theological journal catholic reformation chaplaincy christian calling christian doctrine contemplative life counter reformation covenant thought creation faith formation fides reformata finance gregory the great heidelberg catechism holy spirit human sexuality image of God immortality of the soul kerux kierkegaard leslie newbigin luther money morality natural law neo calvinism oliver o'donovan panentheism pastoral care periodical prolegomena reformation reformed simplicity stewardship stromata journal the church theology theology and science dialogue vocation work

academic papers

  • Should we read Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation as an apologetics of despair?
    Should we read Herman Bavinck’s Th...
  • John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formation
    John Calvin’s two-fold notion of f...
  • NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
    NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
  • How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolution
    How Bavinck responds to the challenges o...

recent posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary a...
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me ab...
  • Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergy
    Gregory the Great on the balance of the ...

blog comments

Gordon on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias D'Oleo on Is the denial of penal substit…
Ron on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias Doleo on How does Calvin understand the…

networking

  • Academia.edu
  • Facebook
  • Google Scholar
  • PhilPapers

© 2009-2023 Isaias D'Oleo.
Unless otherwise specified, the content of this website and blog is licensed as
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Blog at WordPress.com.


Follow rev. isaias d'oleo on Wordpress.com