rev. isaias doleo
a christian theist in a postmodern world
  • home
  • blog
    • financial stewardship
    • gender and sexuality
    • leadership
    • neocalvinism
    • pastoral care
    • the church
    • theology
    • work and vocation
  • papers
    • articles
    • editorials
    • periodicals
    • reviews
  • publications
  • more…
    • curriculum vitae
    • privacy policy
    • research stuff
    • resourceful links

Kuyper as a theologian

March 15, 2019|blog, neocalvinism|abraham kuyper, neo calvinism, theologian
Every Square Inch

In “It Shall Not Be So Among You,” Kuyper presents us his first sermon after the church dispute around 1883. American scholar James Bratt claims that this writing is important because of the principles Kuyper offers us by using applied theology to the situation he was facing. From this, one will observe Kuyper’s role as a modern church reformer. Such a role, however, was not free of controversy. The Doleantie, as Kuyper called it, shows us not only Kuyper’s zeal about the church but also his fierce personality. As Bratt argues, “his church reform proved to be the greatest disappointment of his life.” (p. 151) He promoted a church split and succeeded. With no doubt, I am convinced that such an event shaped Kuyper’s life strongly.

Kuyper not only split the church but opened fundamental questions about the identity and mission of his own movement, of the Reformed tradition, of the whole nation, Bratt writes.

In my opinion, I do not see this church split promoted by Kuyper as merely a negative event. Rather, although radical, this difficult event opened the door for the Dutch Reformed church to look for renewal from within.

An interesting fact was that the Doleantie resembled Kuyper’s agenda of 1869. Such agenda dealt with his Kuyper’s vision for education and school. For Bratt, “the Doleantie was the radicalized form of the Calvinistic agenda for school – and church – reform that Kuyper had first unveiled in Utrecht in 1869, elaborated into a systematic program a decade later, and now put into direct action.” (p. 157) Bratt suggests a significant point here: Kuyper’s project was not new. Instead, it had been reshaped and improved. This should not be a surprise considering Kuyper’s belief that the Dutch church seemed to be blind (Cf. p. 158). He wanted to challenge the status quo. For Kuyper, church reformation was not only a matter of doctrine. His vision was broader. The reform dealt with church structure, organization, hierarchy, and church renewal. Although Kuyper’s Doleantie was found at the end as a fellowship and not to represent the former Dutch Reformed Church, this fact did not stop Kuyper from promoting his vision. Kuyper ended with a church denomination, which eventually merged with the Christian Reformed Church of the Netherlands.

Now, perhaps Kuyper’s church reform failed. In part it did. In part, it did not. By Kuyper’s original hopes, his project fell far short. However, Kuyper’s assessment of the Dutch Reformed Church was right in many respects. I think the Doleantie’s merger with the Christian Reformed Church demonstrates Kuyper’s project succeeded, at least partly. The cost was extremely high.

The Doleantie issue raises the question of Kuyper as a theologian. As Bratt correctly recognizes, the source of Kuyper’s theology is his understanding of the church (p. 172). His notion of the church as organism prevented Kuyper of considering the church as a static institution that did not experience change, especially when those changes were related to the cultural dimension of the church. Not surprisingly, Bratt identifies Kuyper as a “theologian [working] under the rubric of the three C’s” – the church, culture, and Calvinism. (p. 172). One must note, however, that Kuyper’s theology was influenced by other theologians as well. Schleiermacher, for example, influenced Kuyper with his notion of the church as a free and voluntary community (p. 174). Calvin’s teaching, of course, played a significant role as well. “With all Calvinists, he espoused a robust Trinitarianism, a radical theocentricity. and an overriding concern with the redemptive work of Christ,” Bratt writes (p. 173).

Perhaps, the most important topic related to Kuyper’s role as a theologian was his development of the idea of the church as an organism. This notion allowed Kuyper to elevate the church more by contrasting the body of Christ who is witnessing in their everyday vocations vs. the institutional church (the church on earth as we know it).

*All references are taken from Bratt, James D. Abraham Kuyper: Modern Calvinist, Christian Democrat (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013).

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

June 18, 2022 Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

About the author

Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

I'm an ordained minister currently earning a Ph.D in Philosophical Theology at Calvin Seminary. My purpose with the following blog is to promote critical reflection on modern issues in theology, hoping it sparks stimulating conversations. When not writing, I like to bike and try new coffees.

Related Posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?June 15, 2022
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary MoralityFebruary 7, 2022
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presenceJanuary 17, 2022

Popular Posts

  • Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and female
    Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and femaleNovember 3, 2020
  • Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiation
    Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiationDecember 4, 2020
  • How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?
    How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?February 9, 2021
← Kuyper and the application of the anti-thesis
Girard on desire, violence, and the atonement →

Enter your comments here... Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013

topics

abraham kuyper active life aquinas aristotle atonement augustine bavinck book review calvin calvin theological journal catholic reformation chaplaincy christian calling christian doctrine contemplative life counter reformation covenant thought creation faith formation fides reformata finance gregory the great heidelberg catechism holy spirit human sexuality image of God immortality of the soul kerux kierkegaard leslie newbigin luther money morality natural law neo calvinism oliver o'donovan panentheism pastoral care periodical prolegomena reformation reformed simplicity stewardship stromata journal the church theology theology and science dialogue vocation work

academic papers

  • Should we read Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation as an apologetics of despair?
    Should we read Herman Bavinck’s Th...
  • John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formation
    John Calvin’s two-fold notion of f...
  • NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
    NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
  • How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolution
    How Bavinck responds to the challenges o...

recent posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary a...
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me ab...
  • Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergy
    Gregory the Great on the balance of the ...

blog comments

Gordon on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias D'Oleo on Is the denial of penal substit…
Ron on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias Doleo on How does Calvin understand the…

networking

  • Academia.edu
  • Facebook
  • Google Scholar
  • PhilPapers

© 2009-2023 Isaias D'Oleo.
Unless otherwise specified, the content of this website and blog is licensed as
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Blog at WordPress.com.


Follow rev. isaias d'oleo on Wordpress.com