rev. isaias doleo
a christian theist in a postmodern world
  • home
  • blog
    • financial stewardship
    • gender and sexuality
    • leadership
    • neocalvinism
    • pastoral care
    • the church
    • theology
    • work and vocation
  • papers
    • articles
    • editorials
    • periodicals
    • reviews
  • publications
  • more…
    • curriculum vitae
    • privacy policy
    • research stuff
    • resourceful links

Brief overview of the Catholic Reformation

May 2, 2020|blog, theology|catholic reformation, council of trent, counter reformation
Council of Trent

What roles did Pope Paul III, Ignatius Loyola and the Jesuits, and the Council of Trent play in the Counter-Reformation? In the following post I will briefly answer these questions and provide a brief overview of the Catholic/Counter-Reformation, including its roots.

First of all, Catholic/Counter-reformation Reformation was the response and/or reaction of the Catholic church toward the challenges made by the sixteen-century Protestant Reformation. The Protestant Reformation started with Luther’s proclamation of the 95 theses in 1517 while Leo X were the Pope of the Catholic church. But it was until the papacy of Paul III that significant changes and response raised from the Catholic church.

Paul III, in some respects, was in agreement with some of the problems revealed by Luther and others. For instance, Paul III agreed, to a certain point, that the church clergy and the process of selecting candidates for ministry needed to improve. An important step Paul III took was to promote the creation of new orders within the church. Because of it, the Order of the Jesuits was born. Despite the measures taken by Paul III, it was Pope Paul IV who took a more aggressive strategy against the Protestant Reformation. During the papacy of Paul IV, it was created the Index of Forbidden Books, which had the purpose of creating a list of apparent heretic European books with the objective of destroying them for the promotion of the Protestant Reformation and/for damaging the image of the Catholic church, including the attack of her doctrines. Not a surprise, Paul IV was most known for being the responsible to re-establish the Holy Inquisition to control heretics in Rome.

Regarding the importance of Ignatio Loyola in Catholic/Counter-Reformation it is important to mention that he was the priest who founded the Order of the Jesuits or Society of Jesus after Pope Paul III approved the project submitted to him. The Order emphasized religious education, besides promoting a total obedience, submission, and service to the Pope. The emphasis on chastity and poverty was also made. In some sense, the new Order resembled the Protestant emphasis on theological education. The Jesuits’ process of formation focused on the study of humanities, theology, and philosophy. Perhaps this has been the reason many teachers in Catholic colleges and schools belong to this Order. Finally, since its creation the Jesuits have been in hot debates with Protestants in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Loyola is also known for promoting aesthetic spiritual exercises, that were a list of contemplative practices such as prayers, reflection, meditation, etc. to promote spiritual grow in believers. More recently, well-known Catholic theologians who belonged to this Order such as Chardin, Balthasar and Rahner. As noted, the Jesuits played a fundamental role in what we might be called the “Catholic Reformation,” bringing a renewal to clergy.

The Council of Trent was the other major response to the Protestant Reformation that raised from the Catholic/Counter-reformation movement. The ecumenical Council was developed through 18 years around mid-sixteen century in Europe. The purpose of the Council was to discuss and explain the Catholic doctrines that had been attacked by the Reformation. The discussion of the Council were developed taking four major areas as starting points: the response to the Protestant emphasis on Sola Scriptura, the definition of heresies regarding the Sacraments, establishing clear differences between the Catholic doctrine and Lutheranism, the emphasis on clergy improvement based on moral grounds, and the solidification of Papal authority. It is in this respect where resides the importance of the Council — it was the opportunity of the Catholic church to clarify important elements of several doctrines such considering Scripture and tradition was reliable sources of revelation, affirming the doctrine of justification by grace, the defense of the prohibition of marriage among priests, the adoption of an official text of the Scriptures such as the Vulgata Latina, the affirmation of the real presence of Christ in the mass, and the defense of the Papal authority, among others. The Council also polished Catholic liturgy and its systematization of the Roman rite, establishing a new standard for the Roman Catholic mass.

In conclusion, the creation of the Order of the Jesuits, the establishment of the Holy Inquisition, and, the Council of Trent can be considered, grosso modo, the major ways in which the Catholic church responded (in one sense) and reacted (in the other sense) to/against the Protestant Reformation started by Luther and early Reformers. Perhaps the biggest benefit for Catholicism in all this process was the revision and consolidation of the Catholic doctrines that resulted from the decisions adopted by the ecumenical Council. Although there were two major clerical positions represented in the Council, those who supported a strong reaction to Protestantism and those who believed the answer should be a more ecumenical approach, the strong response prevailed. This fact definitely shaped the way in which the Catholic church responded to the challenges. As appreciated earlier, such as response was energetic and very oppressive, in many respects, to the Protestant faith. This was something that was observed much later in the places where the Inquisition was established such as Spain, Mexico, France, and other important countries where Catholicism was the majority.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

June 14, 2022 Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

About the author

Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

I'm an ordained minister currently earning a Ph.D in Philosophical Theology at Calvin Seminary. My purpose with the following blog is to promote critical reflection on modern issues in theology, hoping it sparks stimulating conversations. When not writing, I like to bike and try new coffees.

Related Posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?June 15, 2022
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary MoralityFebruary 7, 2022
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presenceJanuary 17, 2022

Popular Posts

  • Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and female
    Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and femaleNovember 3, 2020
  • Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiation
    Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiationDecember 4, 2020
  • How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?
    How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?February 9, 2021
← Stewardship series – Should be church giving personal but not private?
Should it be called the Counter Reformation or Catholic Reformation? →

Enter your comments here... Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013

topics

abraham kuyper active life aquinas aristotle atonement augustine bavinck book review calvin calvin theological journal catholic reformation chaplaincy christian calling christian doctrine contemplative life counter reformation covenant thought creation faith formation fides reformata finance gregory the great heidelberg catechism holy spirit human sexuality image of God immortality of the soul kerux kierkegaard leslie newbigin luther money morality natural law neo calvinism oliver o'donovan panentheism pastoral care periodical prolegomena reformation reformed simplicity stewardship stromata journal the church theology theology and science dialogue vocation work

academic papers

  • Should we read Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation as an apologetics of despair?
    Should we read Herman Bavinck’s Th...
  • John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formation
    John Calvin’s two-fold notion of f...
  • NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
    NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
  • How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolution
    How Bavinck responds to the challenges o...

recent posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary a...
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me ab...
  • Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergy
    Gregory the Great on the balance of the ...

blog comments

Gordon on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias D'Oleo on Is the denial of penal substit…
Ron on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias Doleo on How does Calvin understand the…

networking

  • Academia.edu
  • Facebook
  • Google Scholar
  • PhilPapers

© 2009-2023 Isaias D'Oleo.
Unless otherwise specified, the content of this website and blog is licensed as
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Blog at WordPress.com.


Follow rev. isaias d'oleo on Wordpress.com