rev. isaias doleo
a christian theist in a postmodern world
  • home
  • blog
    • financial stewardship
    • gender and sexuality
    • leadership
    • neocalvinism
    • pastoral care
    • the church
    • theology
    • work and vocation
  • papers
    • articles
    • editorials
    • periodicals
    • reviews
  • publications
  • more…
    • curriculum vitae
    • privacy policy
    • research stuff
    • resourceful links

NT Wright and the body-soul predicament

December 19, 2016|articles, papers|body-soul debate, immortality of the soul, nt wright1
NT Wright

N.T. Wright has offered Christian philosophers a proposal where it is apparently possible to hold the belief in the intermediate state-resurrection of the body and an ontological holism in the same sense at the same time. I argue that this not only creates a basic contradiction in Wright’s ontological paradigm, but also it is not a coherent and tenable proposal despite the fact one might eventually find a potential solution to such a quandary.

Many questions have risen about the mind-body debate throughout the centuries. The topic has not only been of interest to Hebrew and Jewish theologians but also to Greek philosophers, not only to the Western but also to the Eastern, and similarly, not only to Christian scholars but also to mainstream thinkers and philosophers. Therefore, the mind-body debate is more than an abstract topic, but a human endeavor. The area I am interested in analyzing in this paper is regarding some of the implications of holding the belief in the intermediate state-resurrection of the body in relation to the nature of the human being. Thus, certain kinds of monists (e.g. physical, organic, and holistic) usually claim that when human persons die, it happens to be the dissolution of their being. On the contrary, dualists — who tend to claim that after bodily death human persons may continue to exist– argue that there is a real intermediate state after bodily death where human persons exist in a disembodied and temporal form. This dichotomy has caused those biblical scholars who hold to dualism affirm the intermediate state, while those who hold to the monist view deny it. The mind-body debate would not have importance if it did not impact people’s lives at all. As it does, the discussion has serious moral and ethical repercussions, although postmodern society usually downplays those repercussions.

A well-known theologian and scholar who has discussed the nature of the human person is N.T. Wright. Besides his ability to articulate in a clear theological language, Wright’s perspicuity in discussing central teachings in the New Testament is noteworthy and admirable. He is a brilliant writer. Nonetheless, I find his position and reflections on the reality of the soul sort of troubling. Although Wright does affirm a real intermediate state, he also defends an ontological holism. How should these contradictory positions be treated? In light of Wright’s affirmation of two opposing beliefs, I will focus on his article titled “Mind, Spirit, Soul and Body: All for One and One for All: Reflections on Paul’s Anthropology in his Complex Contexts” in order to demonstrate that N.T. Wright’s position of defending both his ontological-holistic understanding of the human person and his belief in a real intermediate state-bodily resurrection in the same sense at the same time is not coherent and tenable, despite the fact one might eventually find a potential solution to such a quandary.

*This is a summary of theĀ paper published as ā€œN.T. Wright and the Body-Soul Predicament: The Presumption of Duality in Ontological Dualism,ā€Ā Stromata:Ā The Graduate Journal of Calvin Theological SeminaryĀ 58, no.1 (Fall/Winter 2016): 111-136. If you’d like to read this paper in full, please clickĀ here. All rights reserved by the publisher. Used by permission.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

June 14, 2022 Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

About the author

Rev. Isaias D'Oleo

I'm an ordained minister currently earning a Ph.D in Philosophical Theology at Calvin Seminary. My purpose with the following blog is to promote critical reflection on modern issues in theology, hoping it sparks stimulating conversations. When not writing, I like to bike and try new coffees.

Related Posts

  • Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergy
    Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergyOctober 15, 2021
  • How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolution
    How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolutionJuly 29, 2021
  • John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formation
    John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formationOctober 31, 2020

Popular Posts

  • Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and female
    Sexuality series – Augustine on being created male and femaleNovember 3, 2020
  • Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiation
    Sexuality series – Oliver O’Donovan on the importance of sexual differentiationDecember 4, 2020
  • How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?
    How does Calvin understand the role natural law plays in social and civil life?February 9, 2021
Reimaging Gideon’s leadership in light of Max Weber’s sociology of authority →

One Response to NT Wright and the body-soul predicament

  • Andrew C. January 20, 2017

    I noticed you engaged NT Wright’s book Resurrection of the Son of God that highlights the existence of the idea of bodily resurrection in ancient Judaism. What surprised me was your claim about Wright’s alleged ontological holism despite Wright’s strong defense of the doctrine of resurrection.

    Reply

Enter your comments here... Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013

topics

abraham kuyper active life aquinas aristotle atonement augustine bavinck book review calvin calvin theological journal catholic reformation chaplaincy christian calling christian doctrine contemplative life counter reformation covenant thought creation faith formation fides reformata finance gregory the great heidelberg catechism holy spirit human sexuality image of God immortality of the soul kerux kierkegaard leslie newbigin luther money morality natural law neo calvinism oliver o'donovan panentheism pastoral care periodical prolegomena reformation reformed simplicity stewardship stromata journal the church theology theology and science dialogue vocation work

academic papers

  • Should we read Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation as an apologetics of despair?
    Should we read Herman Bavinck’s Th...
  • John Calvin’s two-fold notion of faith and the possibility of faith formation
    John Calvin’s two-fold notion of f...
  • NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
    NT Wright and the body-soul predicament
  • How Bavinck responds to the challenges of the theory of evolution
    How Bavinck responds to the challenges o...

recent posts

  • Is the denial of penal substitutionary atonement a heresy?
    Is the denial of penal substitutionary a...
  • Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
    Bavinck’s Contemporary Morality
  • What Martin Luther King has taught me about God’s divine presence
    What Martin Luther King has taught me ab...
  • Gregory the Great on the balance of the christian life of the clergy
    Gregory the Great on the balance of the ...

blog comments

Gordon on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias D'Oleo on Is the denial of penal substit…
Ron on Is the denial of penal substit…
Rev. Isaias Doleo on How does Calvin understand the…

networking

  • Academia.edu
  • Facebook
  • Google Scholar
  • PhilPapers

Ā© 2009-2023 Isaias D'Oleo.
Unless otherwise specified, the content of this website and blog is licensed as
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Blog at WordPress.com.


Follow rev. isaias d'oleo on Wordpress.com