Topic: Neocalvinism
Evolution

There are many areas where we can appreciate Kuyper’s criticism of culture. One of those areas is his interaction between science and theology, and more specifically, science with biblical revelation. Kuyper debated evolution in his 1899 rectoral oration at the Free University of Amsterdam. He criticized a series of features of Darwin’s theory of evolution. These objections include the theory’s features of naturalism, its mechanistic understanding of the world, its atheistic worldview, and its a-teleological characteristic. Without a doubt, the theory of evolution has been one of the most controversial topics for modern Christians. Kuyper’s article ‘evolution’ not only shows …

Every Square Inch

In “It Shall Not Be So Among You,” Kuyper presents us with his first sermon after the church dispute around 1883. American scholar James Bratt claims that this writing is important because of the principles Kuyper offers us by using applied theology to the situation he was facing. From this, one will observe Kuyper’s role as a modern church reformer. Such a role, however, was not free of controversy. The Doleantie, as Kuyper called it, shows us not only Kuyper’s zeal about the church but also his fierce personality. As Bratt argues, “his church reform proved to be the greatest …

Abraham Kuyper

James Bratt’s following words could summarize one of the goals Abraham Kuyper achieved as a Christian thinker. Kuyper “upgrade[d] Calvinism from an old dogma to an active life, to put Modernist methods to orthodox ends, and to redefine the church to make it fit, and challenge, the contemporary world” (p. 42). I concur. However, how did Kuyper do it in theoretical terms? In trying to answer the former question, I will look to another Bratt’s work on Kuyper. One of the issues that emerges from the chapters “Modernism” and “Conservatism & Orthodoxy” in James Bratt’s Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader is …

Abraham Kuyper and his development of a christian worldview

In Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader, James Bratt cleans the image of Kuyper (1837-1920) from long-held misconceptions and caricatures. One of the aspects Bratt highlights is the multivocal character of Kuyper’s career: state leader, theologian, politician, scholar, and journalist. If we want to interpret Kuyper’s writings correctly, a perspective informed by an accurate social-historical context of Kuyper’s life is a must. Part of the problem arises from the fact that Kuyper “was a man of many voices. He was multivocal in the number of fields in which he spoke: church and theology, politics, and society, culture and education, international affairs and …